As part of the NAFEMS Webinar Programme, the webinar Challenges in the Computational Modeling of Multi-Physics Process and Systems – with a special focus on Fluid-Structure Interaction will be held on June 20th 2007.
Featuring contributions from MultiPhysics experts Dr Mark Cross and Dr Avril Slone from University of Wales, Swansea, this event is accessible from around the globe.
The demands of industry for ever higher levels of fidelity in system design and its optimisation in-service are continually reflected in the capabilities expected of CAE simulation and analysis environments. Hence it is becoming important, not just to make existing simulation capabilities more accessible by engineers and technicians with a limited simulation knowledge base, but to provide capabilities to enable the multi-physics interaction that occur amongst phenomena in reality – fluids with structures, coupled with thermo-chemical fields, electro-magnetic forces and ultimately acoustics as well. Identifying the way in which interactions might be represented in practical terms are genuine challenges:
The CAE analysis community have focussed upon coupling amongst existing tools by enabling the exchange of simulation data within a coherent user environment. MpCCI has played a significant role here to enable such code interactions, whilst others have built code specific interfaces to cope with all the demands of close coupling. Other scientific communities have begun to use emerging software tools, which whilst less mature and rich in individual phenomena capabilities, nevertheless, focus upon facilitating the interactions amongst phenomena. So a variety of solutions are emerging which enable effective multi-physics simulation and analysis.
There is a paradox here – the user community demand accessibility to multi-physics capability combined with usability. The latter inevitably reduces the user’s ability configure the physics in building a model. Whilst many are grateful that they have such a capability already programmed in, more advanced users are frustrated because of their needs to access the ‘code’ internals to push the capability envelope of such technologies. This is because each new problem cannot simply be switched on – it must be approached in steps, considering each phenomenon separately and then introducing the coupling at appropriate levels. Hence, the strategy for multi-physics simulation is essentially more challenging than that for conventional phenomena specific CAE analysis.
Multi-physics simulation is deceptively challenging, and no more so than in the analysis of fluid structure interaction (FSI). The analysis of FSI seems straightforward enough – the fluid loads the structure surface and then the subsequent deformation of the structure influences the geometrical shape of the surrounding flow domain. If the interaction is steady, the problem is much simpler – it is the natural transient behaviour that is such a challenge to capture.
What makes this so tough to do well is a combination of challenges:
a) the problem of effecting data exchanges between solvers for fluid and dynamic structures that are entirely disparate (including the resulting software structures)
b) capturing the time accurate behaviour of each of the fluid and structural components
c) the capture of the additional physics that arises as a matter of the interactions (e.g. spatial or geometrical conservation), and
d) how the boundary conditions change as a consequence of distinctive flow regimes
to name but four.
The objective of this contribution is to address the challenges and progress being made to enable the practical application of multi-physics simulation technologies in leading edge industries, with a special focus on the challenges of fluid-structure-interaction.
Full details can be found at www.nafems.org/events/nafems/2007/multiphysics/
Date: May 28, 2007