This Website is not fully compatible with Internet Explorer.
For a more complete and secure browsing experience please consider using Microsoft Edge, Firefox, or Chrome

Harmonisation of Design Codes and Standards in Nuclear Industry

Harmonisation of Design Codes and Standards in Nuclear Industry

View the recording




After more than 50 years of development, the civil nuclear power industry is now ready for standardised reactor designs which will enable the reactor designs from one country to be built in another country. Such standardisation will help nuclear power to contribute to the clean energy needs and lead to safer and more reliable use of nuclear power around the world. One of the areas where the nuclear industry has taken initiative is to harmonise industry codes and standards. This presentation describes the first pilot project being run by an International Task Force set up by the World Nuclear Association under their Cooperation in Reactor Design Evaluation and Licensing (CORDEL) group to harmonisation codes and standards.

The first step towards harmonisation of pressure boundary codes and standards has been completed by the Code Comparison Project which has been managed by the ASME Standards Technology LLC. Six Standards Development Organisations (SDOs) namely ASME (USA), AFCEN (France), KEA (Korea), JSME (Japan), NIKIET (Russia) and CSA (Canada) had participated in the project. The scope of the code comparison project was restricted to Class 1 components only including pressure vessels, piping, valves and pumps. The objective was to identify the significant differences that would have an impact on designing and manufacturing a component in one country and using it in another country. The code comparison project has highlighted various reasons which have resulted in the differences in national codes and standards. It is recognised that all differences cannot be resolved but some progress towards convergence and mutual recognition could be achieved in the short- to medium-term. Therefore, as a start, the proposed Pilot Project will be focused on design codes and standards only in the two areas – technical design and personnel qualifications. It should be clarified that the need to harmonise does not imply non-compliance but should be considered as achieving equivalent status in other countries.

There are two basic approaches to the design of engineering components and structures: design by rule and design by analysis. In the design by rule approach, rules and limitations set by a design standard are adhered to. The design by analysis approach requires either analytical or computational effort to predict stress levels and this is where computational techniques like the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is increasingly being used in the industry. The commercially available FEA software packages are already harmonised as they are based on common mathematical principles, however, their application in design is not. The methodology and nomenclature of design codes are different from those used in numerical techniques like the FEA. Since an FEA can produce a lot of detailed stress information, it is important to appreciate the importance of various classes of stresses and their respective limits. Before finalising the design, an analyst has to demonstrate that the structural design meets the requirements set down in the design code agreed between the supplier and the buyer. He or she has to assess the data from the finite element analysis in accordance with the rules set in the design code. Such design assessments not only require analysis expertise but also good knowledge of the design rules and their interpretation.

Harmonisation of allowable stress limits is the most important aspect as they influence the methodology used to justify the design, furthermore, these stress limits which are imposed to prevent certain failure modes must be based on common scientific principles. With advanced analysis and structural reliability methods, it should be possible to have common technical rules and avoid any inconsistencies in the codes and standards. It is proposed to focus on the harmonisation of allowable stress limits for this pilot project.


  • Welcome & Introduction
    Tim Morris, NAFEMS
  • Harmonisation of Design Codes and Standards in Nuclear Industry
    Nawal Prinja
  • The EASIT2 Competence Framework ... An Update
    Tim Morris, NAFEMS
  • Q & A Session


Webinar Presenter

Professor Nawal K. PrinjaProfessor Nawal K. Prinja is the technical director of UK based AMEC Nuclear. Nawal has three decades of experience in the nuclear industry. In his current role, he is responsible for managing technical capability, application of codes and standards, and serving as an advisor on technical issues. 

Nawal has co-authored three books for NAFEMS, including Use of Finite Element Analysis in the Design Process,  An Introduction to the Use of Material Models in FE, and How to do Seismic Analysis Using Finite Elements. Additionally, he has written articles for several technical publications. He holds a position of Honorary Professor at the School of Engineering at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. 

Nawal attributes his accomplishments to his passion for educating others and love of solving complex technical problems. He holds an honors degree in aeronautical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from the University of Newcastle, and a PhD degree in applied mechanics from the University of Manchester. 

Currently he is chairing the International Task Force on Harmonisation of Codes set by the World Nuclear Association’s CORDEL project, he is consulted by IAEA as a technical expert and he is a member of the International Scientific Committee of SMiRT.