This Website is not fully compatible with Internet Explorer.
For a more complete and secure browsing experience please consider using Microsoft Edge, Firefox, or Chrome

Democratization: Next-Generation Engineering Simulation Environments


Democratization: Next-Generation Engineering Simulation Environments


We have invited five of the largest CAE software providers in the analysis and simulation industry to provide a eight-minute overview of each company’s strategy for building and supporting next-generation computing architectures for open-ended collaborative engineering. Specifically, we have asked these companies to prepare three slides each, covering: 
  1. Usability & Interoperability
    • CAx Design / Analysis / Manufacturing / Testing Collaboration Tools
  2. Standards
    • Long-Term Archiving & Retrieval / STEP / FMI
  3. Voice of the End-User Community 

Our host for this webinar was Dr. Rod Dreisbach, The Boeing Company (retired), Chairman of the NAFEMS Americas Steering Committee, and Member of the NAFEMS Council of Management.  



Welcome & Introduction
  • Mr. Matthew Ladzinski, NAFEMS  
  • Dr. Rod Dreisbach, The Boeing Company (retired)
Software Provider Strategies for Addressing Next-Generation Computing Architectures
  • Venkat Parameshwaran, VP, Enterprise Products at Altair Engineering 
  • Fabien Letailleur, Senior MI Specialist, Dassault Systèmes
  • Mark Donley, Product Manager, NX Nastran at Siemens PLM Software
Q & A Session




During the past decade there has been a significant growth in industrial applications of engineering analysis and simulation for single and multidisciplinary domains.  Capabilities of commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) software have increased considerably; however, a majority of industry-specific processes require external linking of the COTS with analyses performed by other competitive COTS or by proprietary tools.  In addition to the complexity of the processes themselves, analysts and designers need to account for an ever-increasing number of requirements to produce realistic industrial designs that are competitive.

From an enterprise perspective it is often advantageous to utilize COTS as opposed to proprietary process integration and design optimization (PIDO) tools:  PIDO tools, by their nature, typically require additional features to be added to the tools, along with additional requirements and sub-processes for using the tools in support of the overall desired processes.  Thus, the designers and analysts are required to master the challenges arising from the complexity of these new enhancements and extra processes.  This approach can be contrasted with using COTS, which typically result in final processes that are simpler and should be easier to maintain.

The possibility of exploiting COTS tools more extensively in the industrial design processes is real; however, this opportunity must address certain consumer requirements.  Of particular significance are the next-generation engineering computing architectures currently being developed by the CAE vendors.  It is obvious that the new architectures should be based on the capabilities and robustness of the current advanced COTS, but with new improved enhancements for usability, integration of cross-functional engineering domains, management of the simulation data, across-organization/company collaboration, and with embedded decision-making algorithms through predictive analytics.  Such attributes being inherent to the new COTS would provide opportunities for gaining more industrial support and a faster increase in the community of engineers across multiple industries using engineering modeling, analysis and simulation more effectively. 




Note: The presentation and recording files are only available to NAFEMS members. To access the password for this webinar, login with your member credentials, and then click here.